<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 136 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8419</link>
    <description>In determining whether a share transaction is trading or investment in nature, the decisive test is the real character of the dealings as shown by the assessee&#039;s intention and the surrounding circumstances at the relevant time. The pattern of purchases and sales, fluctuations in voting control, and the disposal of substantial holdings supported a commercial adventure in shares directed to resale rather than acquisition of an enduring capital asset. On that approach, the loss on sale of shares was treated as a revenue loss deductible in computing business income, and the contrary view that the loss was capital in nature could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 136 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8419</link>
      <description>In determining whether a share transaction is trading or investment in nature, the decisive test is the real character of the dealings as shown by the assessee&#039;s intention and the surrounding circumstances at the relevant time. The pattern of purchases and sales, fluctuations in voting control, and the disposal of substantial holdings supported a commercial adventure in shares directed to resale rather than acquisition of an enduring capital asset. On that approach, the loss on sale of shares was treated as a revenue loss deductible in computing business income, and the contrary view that the loss was capital in nature could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>