<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 955 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344684</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm additions based on evidence for most transactions, including premium on cash sales. However, the premium added to sales with M/s. Jhaveri Polymers was deleted as the sales were later reconciled, with no basis for the addition found in the seized documents. The Court partially favored the assessee and partially the revenue, allowing the tax appeal in part and disposing of the matter accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 955 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344684</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm additions based on evidence for most transactions, including premium on cash sales. However, the premium added to sales with M/s. Jhaveri Polymers was deleted as the sales were later reconciled, with no basis for the addition found in the seized documents. The Court partially favored the assessee and partially the revenue, allowing the tax appeal in part and disposing of the matter accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>