<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 952 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for A.Ys 2005-06 and 2006-07. For A.Ys 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10, partial allowances were granted. Specific reliefs were provided for self-supervision and CPWD rate differences in construction cost assessments. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s contention regarding disallowed loans claimed as returned advances from the husband due to lack of adverse comments from the AO during remand, allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 952 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for A.Ys 2005-06 and 2006-07. For A.Ys 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10, partial allowances were granted. Specific reliefs were provided for self-supervision and CPWD rate differences in construction cost assessments. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s contention regarding disallowed loans claimed as returned advances from the husband due to lack of adverse comments from the AO during remand, allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>