<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 949 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,28,00,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found procedural lapses and contradictions in the AO&#039;s actions, concluding that the addition was not justified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the order pronounced on 31st March 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 949 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,28,00,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found procedural lapses and contradictions in the AO&#039;s actions, concluding that the addition was not justified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the order pronounced on 31st March 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>