<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 947 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, on 25/05/2017, ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of refund for accumulated input service credit related to specific services. The appellant, primarily engaged in exporting services, successfully argued that the disputed services, including Event Management, Real Estate Agent, Tour Operators, and Travel Agent services, were essential for their business operations. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s interpretation of input services and established a nexus between the disputed services and the output services exported. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund of accumulated input service credit for the mentioned services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 947 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, on 25/05/2017, ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of refund for accumulated input service credit related to specific services. The appellant, primarily engaged in exporting services, successfully argued that the disputed services, including Event Management, Real Estate Agent, Tour Operators, and Travel Agent services, were essential for their business operations. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s interpretation of input services and established a nexus between the disputed services and the output services exported. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund of accumulated input service credit for the mentioned services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>