https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344669 The appeal was against the reduction of penalty by Commissioner (A) from Rs. 6,75,535 to Rs. 1,20,000 for small scale manufacturers of ayurvedic cough syrup selling products without paying Central Excise duty. The appellant contested the extended limitation period and suppression of facts, arguing a bona fide reason for non-registration and non-payment of duty. The Judicial Member upheld the penalty reduction to Rs. 1,20,000, dismissing the appeal on 26/05/2017. en-us Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344669 The appeal was against the reduction of penalty by Commissioner (A) from Rs. 6,75,535 to Rs. 1,20,000 for small scale manufacturers of ayurvedic cough syrup selling products without paying Central Excise duty. The appellant contested the extended limitation period and suppression of facts, arguing a bona fide reason for non-registration and non-payment of duty. The Judicial Member upheld the penalty reduction to Rs. 1,20,000, dismissing the appeal on 26/05/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344669