<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8403</link>
    <description>Property standing in a deceased person&#039;s name was treated as his individual estate for estate duty purposes because the accountable person failed to prove that the assets were acquired from an adequate joint family nucleus. The existence of some joint family property did not create a presumption that all properties in a family member&#039;s name were joint property. A claimant asserting joint ownership must prove the source and sufficiency of the common funds for the disputed assets. The plea of blending also failed because there was no evidence that the deceased intended to throw self-acquired property into the common hotchpot. The excluded value of Rs. 36,000 remained outside the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8403</link>
      <description>Property standing in a deceased person&#039;s name was treated as his individual estate for estate duty purposes because the accountable person failed to prove that the assets were acquired from an adequate joint family nucleus. The existence of some joint family property did not create a presumption that all properties in a family member&#039;s name were joint property. A claimant asserting joint ownership must prove the source and sufficiency of the common funds for the disputed assets. The plea of blending also failed because there was no evidence that the deceased intended to throw self-acquired property into the common hotchpot. The excluded value of Rs. 36,000 remained outside the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>