<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 924 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344653</link>
    <description>Proper service of a section 7 insolvency application on the corporate debtor&#039;s registered office, in the manner required by Rule 4(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, is a mandatory precondition for admission. Where the record does not establish dispatch of the application to the registered office, and there is no proof that the registered office was shifted to the address used for service, the application is treated as not duly served. The Tribunal therefore declined to entertain the petition at the threshold and dismissed it for want of proper service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 924 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344653</link>
      <description>Proper service of a section 7 insolvency application on the corporate debtor&#039;s registered office, in the manner required by Rule 4(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, is a mandatory precondition for admission. Where the record does not establish dispatch of the application to the registered office, and there is no proof that the registered office was shifted to the address used for service, the application is treated as not duly served. The Tribunal therefore declined to entertain the petition at the threshold and dismissed it for want of proper service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>