https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344652 Seized narcotic drugs traced to identifiable consignors and addressees did not fall within the category of wholly unclaimed property or unknown offender contemplated by Section 63(2) of the NDPS Act. The statutory scheme required disposal of such seized substances under Section 52A, with the prescribed safeguards for samples and records, rather than direct confiscation under Section 63(2). On that basis, the trial court correctly declined to proceed under Section 63(2), and no interference was warranted with the order directing disposal under Section 52A. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:38:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344652 Seized narcotic drugs traced to identifiable consignors and addressees did not fall within the category of wholly unclaimed property or unknown offender contemplated by Section 63(2) of the NDPS Act. The statutory scheme required disposal of such seized substances under Section 52A, with the prescribed safeguards for samples and records, rather than direct confiscation under Section 63(2). On that basis, the trial court correctly declined to proceed under Section 63(2), and no interference was warranted with the order directing disposal under Section 52A. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344652