https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192824 An order made by the Collector in partition proceedings under section 54 of the Civil Procedure Code remains appealable under section 203 and revisable under section 211 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code because the Collector acts as a revenue officer and the Code contains no express exclusion. The partition process involves operative decisions on division, allocation and delivery of possession, so appellate and revisional remedies are preserved. The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is discretionary, however, and may be refused where the petitioner is not genuinely aggrieved and appears to be using the petition to delay possession. The judgment therefore recognises the remedies but limits relief to the justice of the particular case. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:49:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192824 An order made by the Collector in partition proceedings under section 54 of the Civil Procedure Code remains appealable under section 203 and revisable under section 211 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code because the Collector acts as a revenue officer and the Code contains no express exclusion. The partition process involves operative decisions on division, allocation and delivery of possession, so appellate and revisional remedies are preserved. The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is discretionary, however, and may be refused where the petitioner is not genuinely aggrieved and appears to be using the petition to delay possession. The judgment therefore recognises the remedies but limits relief to the justice of the particular case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192824