<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 18 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8400</link>
    <description>The court allowed all four applications and quashed the impugned notices, concluding that the Income-tax Officer did not have jurisdiction to issue the notices under Section 147(a) as the conditions precedent were not met. The reassessment proceedings were based on subsequent information, falling under Section 147(b), and were barred by the time limit specified in Section 149(1)(b). No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 18 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8400</link>
      <description>The court allowed all four applications and quashed the impugned notices, concluding that the Income-tax Officer did not have jurisdiction to issue the notices under Section 147(a) as the conditions precedent were not met. The reassessment proceedings were based on subsequent information, falling under Section 147(b), and were barred by the time limit specified in Section 149(1)(b). No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>