<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (10) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8399</link>
    <description>Interest paid on arrears of cane cess arising from delayed compliance with a statutory levy was held not deductible as revenue expenditure. The court reasoned that the liability did not arise from borrowed capital or any consensual lending arrangement, so it fell outside interest on borrowed capital under section 10(2)(iii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It also was not an outgoing laid out wholly and exclusively for business, or otherwise deductible in computing business profits, because it resulted from breach of a statutory obligation and was not incidental to carrying on the business. The interest was therefore not allowable as a business deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (10) TMI 12 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8399</link>
      <description>Interest paid on arrears of cane cess arising from delayed compliance with a statutory levy was held not deductible as revenue expenditure. The court reasoned that the liability did not arise from borrowed capital or any consensual lending arrangement, so it fell outside interest on borrowed capital under section 10(2)(iii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It also was not an outgoing laid out wholly and exclusively for business, or otherwise deductible in computing business profits, because it resulted from breach of a statutory obligation and was not incidental to carrying on the business. The interest was therefore not allowable as a business deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>