https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192819 Civil court jurisdiction was excluded where a suit challenged revision of property tax under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The statutory scheme provided assessment, objections, appeals to the Taxation Appeals Committee, a second appeal to the District Court, revisional powers, and a finality clause making the assessment or demand final subject to the prescribed machinery. As the plaint alleged only that the enhancement was excessive, arbitrary and unreasonable, without pleading breach of a fundamental statutory requirement, lack of jurisdiction, or any recognised exception, the civil suit was held not maintainable. The existence of a statutory appellate remedy, even if onerous, did not justify bypassing the bar. en-us Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:34:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192819 Civil court jurisdiction was excluded where a suit challenged revision of property tax under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The statutory scheme provided assessment, objections, appeals to the Taxation Appeals Committee, a second appeal to the District Court, revisional powers, and a finality clause making the assessment or demand final subject to the prescribed machinery. As the plaint alleged only that the enhancement was excessive, arbitrary and unreasonable, without pleading breach of a fundamental statutory requirement, lack of jurisdiction, or any recognised exception, the civil suit was held not maintainable. The existence of a statutory appellate remedy, even if onerous, did not justify bypassing the bar. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192819