<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (11) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8397</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against excluding a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs from the computation of the assessee&#039;s wealth, finding that the purported gift to a minor son lacked essential elements of a valid gift transaction. Emphasizing the absence of clear intention to transfer ownership, acceptance by the minor&#039;s guardian, and evidence of a genuine transfer, the court held that the transfer did not meet legal criteria for exclusion. The court allowed the reference with costs and assessed counsel&#039;s fees accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (11) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8397</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against excluding a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs from the computation of the assessee&#039;s wealth, finding that the purported gift to a minor son lacked essential elements of a valid gift transaction. Emphasizing the absence of clear intention to transfer ownership, acceptance by the minor&#039;s guardian, and evidence of a genuine transfer, the court held that the transfer did not meet legal criteria for exclusion. The court allowed the reference with costs and assessed counsel&#039;s fees accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>