<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST on freight-In invoice as well as to GTA.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=112127</link>
    <description>Where the supplier bears freight, that freight must be added to the taxable value of the goods and taxed at the rate applicable to those goods; treating the same freight as a separate reverse-charge payment to a GTA creates potential double taxation and affects input tax credit eligibility. To avoid this, freight should be contractually charged to the customer or invoiced so that it is not both included in the supply value and later subjected to reverse charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:36:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST on freight-In invoice as well as to GTA.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=112127</link>
      <description>Where the supplier bears freight, that freight must be added to the taxable value of the goods and taxed at the rate applicable to those goods; treating the same freight as a separate reverse-charge payment to a GTA creates potential double taxation and affects input tax credit eligibility. To avoid this, freight should be contractually charged to the customer or invoiced so that it is not both included in the supply value and later subjected to reverse charge.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:36:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=112127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>