https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192810 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the allotment of land in an urban area under the Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Rules, 1955. The Court upheld the cancellation of the allotment, ruling that the land fell within an urban area as defined by the Rules. The argument against the constitutionality of Rule 2(h) under Article 14 of the Constitution was rejected, emphasizing the validity of rules made under the governing Act. The Court found no merit in the appellant's contentions and affirmed the decision of the High Court, dismissing the appeal with costs. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:17:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192810 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the allotment of land in an urban area under the Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Rules, 1955. The Court upheld the cancellation of the allotment, ruling that the land fell within an urban area as defined by the Rules. The argument against the constitutionality of Rule 2(h) under Article 14 of the Constitution was rejected, emphasizing the validity of rules made under the governing Act. The Court found no merit in the appellant's contentions and affirmed the decision of the High Court, dismissing the appeal with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192810