<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (2) TMI 50 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8375</link>
    <description>For business expenditure deductibility, the decisive test is whether the outlay was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, not merely whether it was commercially motivated. Retrenchment compensation and alleged gratuity payments were disallowed because no settled gratuity practice or employee expectation was proved, and the payments were linked to the share sale and transfer of management rather than to a business necessity. By contrast, commutation of pension liability was deductible because it discharged an existing business obligation, and compensation paid to a managing director in lieu of six months&#039; notice was also deductible because it arose from the contractual terms of appointment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (2) TMI 50 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8375</link>
      <description>For business expenditure deductibility, the decisive test is whether the outlay was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, not merely whether it was commercially motivated. Retrenchment compensation and alleged gratuity payments were disallowed because no settled gratuity practice or employee expectation was proved, and the payments were linked to the share sale and transfer of management rather than to a business necessity. By contrast, commutation of pension liability was deductible because it discharged an existing business obligation, and compensation paid to a managing director in lieu of six months&#039; notice was also deductible because it arose from the contractual terms of appointment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>