<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192809</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the suspension order dated 21st May 1970 and held that the respondent was not entitled to anything more than the subsistence allowance paid during the suspension period. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192809</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the suspension order dated 21st May 1970 and held that the respondent was not entitled to anything more than the subsistence allowance paid during the suspension period. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>