<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192809</link>
    <description>A university statute, as modified to conform with the governing Act, was treated as empowering the Vice-Chancellor to suspend a teacher pending disciplinary enquiry, including in cases of misconduct, insubordination, inefficiency, unsatisfactory performance, or emergency requiring immediate action. The Court held that this suspension power was consistent with the continuing service regime, so the suspension order was valid. It further held that a valid suspension temporarily suspends the reciprocal obligations of service and pay, leaving the teacher entitled only to the subsistence allowance provided by the governing rules and not to full salary for the suspension period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (2) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192809</link>
      <description>A university statute, as modified to conform with the governing Act, was treated as empowering the Vice-Chancellor to suspend a teacher pending disciplinary enquiry, including in cases of misconduct, insubordination, inefficiency, unsatisfactory performance, or emergency requiring immediate action. The Court held that this suspension power was consistent with the continuing service regime, so the suspension order was valid. It further held that a valid suspension temporarily suspends the reciprocal obligations of service and pay, leaving the teacher entitled only to the subsistence allowance provided by the governing rules and not to full salary for the suspension period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>