<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 919 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing both the assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals on all grounds. The additions to income for unexplained creditors, payments violating Section 40A(3), and remittance from income earned outside India were all upheld. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning reasonable and supported by precedents, with insufficient evidence provided by the assessee to justify interference. The order was pronounced on 20-04-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 919 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing both the assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals on all grounds. The additions to income for unexplained creditors, payments violating Section 40A(3), and remittance from income earned outside India were all upheld. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning reasonable and supported by precedents, with insufficient evidence provided by the assessee to justify interference. The order was pronounced on 20-04-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>