<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 916 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of brokerage, electricity, legal and professional expenses, and bank charges, citing sections 23 and 24 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized that only deductions explicitly specified in the Act are permissible for computing income from house property. The appeal was dismissed on 19/04/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 916 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of brokerage, electricity, legal and professional expenses, and bank charges, citing sections 23 and 24 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized that only deductions explicitly specified in the Act are permissible for computing income from house property. The appeal was dismissed on 19/04/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>