https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344639 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the interpretation of 'input service' under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court upheld the decision that specific services provided to staff/employees of the factory did not qualify as input services, in line with previous judgments. The appeal was ruled in favor of the Assessee, and no costs were awarded in the case. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:23:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344639 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the interpretation of 'input service' under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court upheld the decision that specific services provided to staff/employees of the factory did not qualify as input services, in line with previous judgments. The appeal was ruled in favor of the Assessee, and no costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344639