https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344635 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's decision in favor of the appellant on all issues, including the eligibility of credit, utilization of CENVAT credit, and limitation period for the demand. The appellant successfully challenged allegations of suppression of facts, denial of credit on input services, and demand exceeding the proposed amount in the show-cause notice. The Tribunal supported the appellant's arguments with legal precedents and found no fault in the impugned order, emphasizing the absence of evidence proving fraudulent intent or suppression by the appellant. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344635 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's decision in favor of the appellant on all issues, including the eligibility of credit, utilization of CENVAT credit, and limitation period for the demand. The appellant successfully challenged allegations of suppression of facts, denial of credit on input services, and demand exceeding the proposed amount in the show-cause notice. The Tribunal supported the appellant's arguments with legal precedents and found no fault in the impugned order, emphasizing the absence of evidence proving fraudulent intent or suppression by the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344635