<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 902 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344631</link>
    <description>Steel structurals fabricated and erected at site, once permanently fixed to the earth, were treated as immovable property rather than excisable goods. Following the Larger Bench view, the Tribunal held that immovable iron and steel structures do not fall under Heading 73.08, which applies only to movable structures or prepared parts capable of being regarded as goods. Because the structures formed part of the roof and framework of the godown and could not be removed or marketed as goods, no excise duty liability arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 902 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344631</link>
      <description>Steel structurals fabricated and erected at site, once permanently fixed to the earth, were treated as immovable property rather than excisable goods. Following the Larger Bench view, the Tribunal held that immovable iron and steel structures do not fall under Heading 73.08, which applies only to movable structures or prepared parts capable of being regarded as goods. Because the structures formed part of the roof and framework of the godown and could not be removed or marketed as goods, no excise duty liability arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>