<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 900 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344629</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit on imported capital goods was held admissible where the assessee produced a certificate in the prescribed proforma under the applicable circular. Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 covered machinery, plant, equipment and similar items used in manufacture as capital goods. The circular for imports under the Project Import Regulations, 1986 accepted an independent Cost Accountant&#039;s certificate where separate invoices or exact identification were difficult, subject to verification. As the certificate described machinery, a coating machine, ancillary equipment and other items falling within the capital goods definition, the requirement was substantially met and denial of credit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 900 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344629</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit on imported capital goods was held admissible where the assessee produced a certificate in the prescribed proforma under the applicable circular. Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 covered machinery, plant, equipment and similar items used in manufacture as capital goods. The circular for imports under the Project Import Regulations, 1986 accepted an independent Cost Accountant&#039;s certificate where separate invoices or exact identification were difficult, subject to verification. As the certificate described machinery, a coating machine, ancillary equipment and other items falling within the capital goods definition, the requirement was substantially met and denial of credit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>