https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344628 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit on inputs and the imposed penalty. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that discrepancies in the invoice descriptions did not negate the actual receipt of the goods by the appellant. It was held that as long as necessary details were present in the invoice, the appellant was entitled to take Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had received the goods legitimately, overturning the decision and granting the appellant the right to avail the Cenvat Credit with consequential benefits. en-us Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344628 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit on inputs and the imposed penalty. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that discrepancies in the invoice descriptions did not negate the actual receipt of the goods by the appellant. It was held that as long as necessary details were present in the invoice, the appellant was entitled to take Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had received the goods legitimately, overturning the decision and granting the appellant the right to avail the Cenvat Credit with consequential benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344628