<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 895 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344624</link>
    <description>A valid show cause notice quantifying the duty demand is mandatory before the department can recover or adjust sums against an assessee&#039;s refund or rebate. Here, the original notice addressed only classification and exemption denial, while later letters and a belated notice could not cure the absence of a quantified demand. The recovery provision was described as a garnishee-type mechanism for third-party monies and not a power to unilaterally appropriate amounts payable to the assessee against an unadjudicated liability. A direction to issue a fresh notice to validate the adjustment was also outside appellate power, so the sanctioned refund or rebate could not be adjusted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 895 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344624</link>
      <description>A valid show cause notice quantifying the duty demand is mandatory before the department can recover or adjust sums against an assessee&#039;s refund or rebate. Here, the original notice addressed only classification and exemption denial, while later letters and a belated notice could not cure the absence of a quantified demand. The recovery provision was described as a garnishee-type mechanism for third-party monies and not a power to unilaterally appropriate amounts payable to the assessee against an unadjudicated liability. A direction to issue a fresh notice to validate the adjustment was also outside appellate power, so the sanctioned refund or rebate could not be adjusted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>