<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 893 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by condoning the delay in filing due to a bona fide mistake, remanding the case for consideration on merits. The decision focused on interpreting Section 35(1) of the Central Excise Act and applying relevant case laws to ensure procedural errors do not unfairly impact parties, emphasizing a just and equitable approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 893 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by condoning the delay in filing due to a bona fide mistake, remanding the case for consideration on merits. The decision focused on interpreting Section 35(1) of the Central Excise Act and applying relevant case laws to ensure procedural errors do not unfairly impact parties, emphasizing a just and equitable approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>