<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 892 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all six appeals, ruling in favor of the appellants and granting relief based on established legal principles regarding procedural irregularities in claiming Cenvat credit on bills/invoices. The Tribunal found that the inadequacies in invoices and distribution of credit without registration as an Input Service Distributor were procedural irregularities that could be rectified, in line with precedents set by previous decisions. The appeals were allowed with any consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:21:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 892 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all six appeals, ruling in favor of the appellants and granting relief based on established legal principles regarding procedural irregularities in claiming Cenvat credit on bills/invoices. The Tribunal found that the inadequacies in invoices and distribution of credit without registration as an Input Service Distributor were procedural irregularities that could be rectified, in line with precedents set by previous decisions. The appeals were allowed with any consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>