https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344619 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit on various services, except for a specific amount due to lack of documentary proof. The decision affirmed that the services qualified as 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and that debit notes with necessary details are valid for credit claims. The impugned order was set aside, and the decision was pronounced in open court on 29/12/2016. en-us Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:21:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344619 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit on various services, except for a specific amount due to lack of documentary proof. The decision affirmed that the services qualified as 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and that debit notes with necessary details are valid for credit claims. The impugned order was set aside, and the decision was pronounced in open court on 29/12/2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344619