<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (2) TMI 49 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8339</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 148 is permissible where subsequent information gives the assessing officer reason to believe that income escaped assessment because the earlier acceptance of the claim rested on false or non-genuine material, and the bar against a mere change of opinion does not apply in that situation. Although the assessee had produced accounts, balance-sheets, lender lists, confirmation letters and, in some instances, discharged hundis at the original stage, later material suggesting that some lenders were name-lenders and that the hundi transactions were not genuine supported reopening. The notice was therefore valid and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (2) TMI 49 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8339</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 148 is permissible where subsequent information gives the assessing officer reason to believe that income escaped assessment because the earlier acceptance of the claim rested on false or non-genuine material, and the bar against a mere change of opinion does not apply in that situation. Although the assessee had produced accounts, balance-sheets, lender lists, confirmation letters and, in some instances, discharged hundis at the original stage, later material suggesting that some lenders were name-lenders and that the hundi transactions were not genuine supported reopening. The notice was therefore valid and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>