<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (4) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8332</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the income from the property was assessable in the hands of the assessee under Section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the provisions of Section 64(iii) were broad enough to include income arising indirectly from assets transferred by the assessee to his wife. The answer to the referred question was in the affirmative and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (4) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8332</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the income from the property was assessable in the hands of the assessee under Section 64(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the provisions of Section 64(iii) were broad enough to include income arising indirectly from assets transferred by the assessee to his wife. The answer to the referred question was in the affirmative and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>