<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 860 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344589</link>
    <description>Recovery proceedings cannot be maintained against a deceased person, and where a sole proprietor dies during pendency of an appeal, the appeal may abate if no continuation is taken in the manner contemplated by Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules. Here, the appellant was a sole proprietorship, the sole proprietor died while the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was pending, and the Tribunal found that the absence of proper continuation led to abatement. The appeal was accordingly disposed of as abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 860 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344589</link>
      <description>Recovery proceedings cannot be maintained against a deceased person, and where a sole proprietor dies during pendency of an appeal, the appeal may abate if no continuation is taken in the manner contemplated by Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules. Here, the appellant was a sole proprietorship, the sole proprietor died while the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was pending, and the Tribunal found that the absence of proper continuation led to abatement. The appeal was accordingly disposed of as abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>