<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 855 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing the correct classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Heading 8704 and the appellant&#039;s compliance with exemption conditions under relevant notifications. The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s argument on non-availment of credit through credit reversal, citing established legal principles and case laws. The decision was rendered on 20/06/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 855 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing the correct classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Heading 8704 and the appellant&#039;s compliance with exemption conditions under relevant notifications. The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s argument on non-availment of credit through credit reversal, citing established legal principles and case laws. The decision was rendered on 20/06/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>