<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 821 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, reversing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) order. The Tribunal granted the set-off of carried forward business loss against profit from the sale of depreciable assets under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act, citing relevant case law. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the claim for business loss/bad debt, following precedents and clarifications on the treatment of bad debts post-amendment in taxation laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 821 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, reversing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) order. The Tribunal granted the set-off of carried forward business loss against profit from the sale of depreciable assets under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act, citing relevant case law. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the claim for business loss/bad debt, following precedents and clarifications on the treatment of bad debts post-amendment in taxation laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>