<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 813 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 11,91,671 and penalties against M/s. National Veneer Products for under-invoicing and mis-declaration of wood veneer quality. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was supported based on evidence from seized records and employee statements, rejecting appeals from both the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of corroborated evidence in proving under-invoicing allegations, concluding that the investigation sufficiently established the misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 813 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 11,91,671 and penalties against M/s. National Veneer Products for under-invoicing and mis-declaration of wood veneer quality. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was supported based on evidence from seized records and employee statements, rejecting appeals from both the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of corroborated evidence in proving under-invoicing allegations, concluding that the investigation sufficiently established the misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>