<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Tribunal found that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest, as the Assessing Officer had meticulously examined the facts and relevant details during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment was conducted after due enquiry and consideration of all necessary information, including discussions on deductions and project details. Legal precedents were cited to support the conclusion that the assessment order was valid and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Tribunal found that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest, as the Assessing Officer had meticulously examined the facts and relevant details during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment was conducted after due enquiry and consideration of all necessary information, including discussions on deductions and project details. Legal precedents were cited to support the conclusion that the assessment order was valid and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>