<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 775 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, affirming that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. It was held that the approval and notification from the Central Government remained valid, and minor variations in the constructed area and the sale of a portion of the Industrial Park did not breach the approval conditions. The Tribunal emphasized that the conditions for the deduction were satisfied, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 775 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, affirming that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. It was held that the approval and notification from the Central Government remained valid, and minor variations in the constructed area and the sale of a portion of the Industrial Park did not breach the approval conditions. The Tribunal emphasized that the conditions for the deduction were satisfied, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>