<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (4) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8307</link>
    <description>High-denomination note encashment requires an assessee to establish a satisfactory source; possession of sufficient money may support the explanation unless it is inherently improbable, while an unexplained receipt may justify an adverse inference. The materials supported rejection of explanations for amounts claimed from the currency office and as cash because reliable proof was absent, sustaining the related addition. However, sale proceeds already established as received in high-denomination notes supported the possibility that a note had been exchanged. Failure to properly evaluate that explanation made the related addition unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (4) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8307</link>
      <description>High-denomination note encashment requires an assessee to establish a satisfactory source; possession of sufficient money may support the explanation unless it is inherently improbable, while an unexplained receipt may justify an adverse inference. The materials supported rejection of explanations for amounts claimed from the currency office and as cash because reliable proof was absent, sustaining the related addition. However, sale proceeds already established as received in high-denomination notes supported the possibility that a note had been exchanged. Failure to properly evaluate that explanation made the related addition unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>