<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1211 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeal filed by M/s Todays Petrotech Limited as it was time-barred. The appellant failed to file the appeal within the condonable period specified by law, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for appeal filings and highlighted the limited scope for condonation of delays beyond the prescribed period. The case underscored the principle that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot extend the condonable period beyond what is allowed by law, emphasizing the need for timely compliance with procedural requirements to avoid dismissal on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:11:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1211 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeal filed by M/s Todays Petrotech Limited as it was time-barred. The appellant failed to file the appeal within the condonable period specified by law, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for appeal filings and highlighted the limited scope for condonation of delays beyond the prescribed period. The case underscored the principle that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot extend the condonable period beyond what is allowed by law, emphasizing the need for timely compliance with procedural requirements to avoid dismissal on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>