<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 779 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee regarding the social welfare expenditure and penalty amount, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. It emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct link between the expenditure and the business purpose to qualify for deductions under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the social welfare expenditure was voluntary charity and not allowable as a business deduction due to the lack of nexus with the business activities. Additionally, the penalty amount debited to the Profit and Loss Account was disallowed as there was no evidence to show it was not imposed for breaching legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:04:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 779 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee regarding the social welfare expenditure and penalty amount, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. It emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct link between the expenditure and the business purpose to qualify for deductions under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the social welfare expenditure was voluntary charity and not allowable as a business deduction due to the lack of nexus with the business activities. Additionally, the penalty amount debited to the Profit and Loss Account was disallowed as there was no evidence to show it was not imposed for breaching legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>