<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 750 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning duty calculation for polyester/cotton blended yarn, citing insufficient documents provided to the assessee by the Department. The original duty demand and penalty were reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the Tribunal found discrepancies in the document supply process, leading to a remand for the assessee to establish their contentions based on necessary documents. The judgment stressed the importance of fair consideration, addressing issues comprehensively, and ensuring the availability of essential documents for a just adjudication process. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further examination, allowing the appeals by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 750 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case concerning duty calculation for polyester/cotton blended yarn, citing insufficient documents provided to the assessee by the Department. The original duty demand and penalty were reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the Tribunal found discrepancies in the document supply process, leading to a remand for the assessee to establish their contentions based on necessary documents. The judgment stressed the importance of fair consideration, addressing issues comprehensively, and ensuring the availability of essential documents for a just adjudication process. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further examination, allowing the appeals by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>