<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 749 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the cenvat credits availed by the appellant for the disputed period. The decision was based on the acceptance of TR-6 challans as proof of payment of Service Tax and the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit they were claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 749 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the cenvat credits availed by the appellant for the disputed period. The decision was based on the acceptance of TR-6 challans as proof of payment of Service Tax and the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the credit they were claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>