<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 742 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to determine the interest amount based on legal precedents, emphasizing the entitlement of the litigant to interest on the refund of confiscated goods. The decision highlighted the importance of considering relevant legal decisions in such cases and urged a prompt resolution of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 742 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to determine the interest amount based on legal precedents, emphasizing the entitlement of the litigant to interest on the refund of confiscated goods. The decision highlighted the importance of considering relevant legal decisions in such cases and urged a prompt resolution of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>