https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344470 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit. It emphasized the mandatory nature of the time limits prescribed in the CBLR, 2013, citing previous decisions by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and the Madras High Court. The non-compliance with these time limits rendered the revocation and forfeiture unjustified, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:00:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344470 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit. It emphasized the mandatory nature of the time limits prescribed in the CBLR, 2013, citing previous decisions by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and the Madras High Court. The non-compliance with these time limits rendered the revocation and forfeiture unjustified, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344470