<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 739 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344468</link>
    <description>A corporate debtor seeking CIRP under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must make full and frank disclosure of financial and operational creditors, debts, defaults, assets and encumbrances. Here, material facts concerning secured properties and pending litigation were not candidly disclosed, so admission was refused. The filing was also treated as an abuse of process because the record suggested it was used to obstruct secured creditors from realising security rather than to pursue bona fide insolvency resolution. On that basis, the tribunal found Section 65 penalty justified for a fraudulent or malicious invocation of the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 739 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344468</link>
      <description>A corporate debtor seeking CIRP under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must make full and frank disclosure of financial and operational creditors, debts, defaults, assets and encumbrances. Here, material facts concerning secured properties and pending litigation were not candidly disclosed, so admission was refused. The filing was also treated as an abuse of process because the record suggested it was used to obstruct secured creditors from realising security rather than to pursue bona fide insolvency resolution. On that basis, the tribunal found Section 65 penalty justified for a fraudulent or malicious invocation of the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>