<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 738 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344467</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the petition under Section 9(5)(ii)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to a pre-existing dispute regarding the claimed debt between GUJCOT and STI India. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs, and the tribunal clarified that its findings should not be considered a final decision on the petitioner&#039;s claim, allowing the petitioner to pursue its rights in other forums, including the pending suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 738 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344467</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the petition under Section 9(5)(ii)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to a pre-existing dispute regarding the claimed debt between GUJCOT and STI India. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs, and the tribunal clarified that its findings should not be considered a final decision on the petitioner&#039;s claim, allowing the petitioner to pursue its rights in other forums, including the pending suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>