https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192764 For approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the employer must strictly comply with the statutory preconditions. "One month's wages" was treated as wages for a uniform 30-day period, but the tender was still defective because it omitted the cash equivalent of milk and biscuits and included a shortfall in dearness allowance, amounting to non-compliance with the proviso. The domestic enquiry was also held defective because witnesses were not examined in the workmen's presence and pre-recorded statements were used, contrary to natural justice and the Standing Orders. Non-payment of subsistence allowance during suspension further vitiated the enquiry. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2017 17:23:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192764 For approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the employer must strictly comply with the statutory preconditions. "One month's wages" was treated as wages for a uniform 30-day period, but the tender was still defective because it omitted the cash equivalent of milk and biscuits and included a shortfall in dearness allowance, amounting to non-compliance with the proviso. The domestic enquiry was also held defective because witnesses were not examined in the workmen's presence and pre-recorded statements were used, contrary to natural justice and the Standing Orders. Non-payment of subsistence allowance during suspension further vitiated the enquiry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192764