https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192763 The court found the petitioner's notice for voluntary retirement valid as it complied with the required three-month notice period. The court ruled that the notice served to the General Manager (Personnel) was proper and effective. The refusal of retirement communicated after the notice period was deemed ineffective, resulting in the petitioner's retirement being effective from the specified date. Disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner post-retirement were declared improper and quashed by the court. The petitioner was granted relief, including arrears with interest, and costs were awarded against the respondents. en-us Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2017 17:21:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192763 The court found the petitioner's notice for voluntary retirement valid as it complied with the required three-month notice period. The court ruled that the notice served to the General Manager (Personnel) was proper and effective. The refusal of retirement communicated after the notice period was deemed ineffective, resulting in the petitioner's retirement being effective from the specified date. Disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner post-retirement were declared improper and quashed by the court. The petitioner was granted relief, including arrears with interest, and costs were awarded against the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192763