<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 19 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8287</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner&#039;s action constituted a valid order under section 274(2) for penalty proceedings. The Court held that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s subsequent entry did not qualify as an order under section 263(1), thereby affirming the lack of jurisdiction for the Commissioner under section 263(1). Costs and counsel&#039;s fee were granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 19 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8287</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner&#039;s action constituted a valid order under section 274(2) for penalty proceedings. The Court held that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s subsequent entry did not qualify as an order under section 263(1), thereby affirming the lack of jurisdiction for the Commissioner under section 263(1). Costs and counsel&#039;s fee were granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>