<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (10) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8275</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act as the respondent&#039;s failure to fill in Part VII of the return constituted non-disclosure of material facts. The appeal was allowed, the lower court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the rule was discharged. No costs were awarded, and the operation of the judgment was stayed for eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (10) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8275</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act as the respondent&#039;s failure to fill in Part VII of the return constituted non-disclosure of material facts. The appeal was allowed, the lower court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the rule was discharged. No costs were awarded, and the operation of the judgment was stayed for eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>